<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Broadband Over Powerline Testing In Austin Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas</link>
	<description>Monitoring the BPL &#124; Broadband Over Power Line Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:24:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadband Focus</title>
		<link>http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas/comment-page-1#comment-5655</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadband Focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas#comment-5655</guid>
		<description>Thanks Glen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Glen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Reid</title>
		<link>http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas/comment-page-1#comment-5653</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 03:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas#comment-5653</guid>
		<description>The City of Austin abandoned the BPL trial in October 2007 after disappointing broadband capacity results and reliability issues.
The City&#039;s final BPL report can be found at:

http://p1k.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/COAAE_BPL_Final_Report.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The City of Austin abandoned the BPL trial in October 2007 after disappointing broadband capacity results and reliability issues.<br />
The City&#8217;s final BPL report can be found at:</p>
<p><a href="http://p1k.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/COAAE_BPL_Final_Report.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://p1k.arrl.org/~ehare/bpl/COAAE_BPL_Final_Report.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadband Focus</title>
		<link>http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas/comment-page-1#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadband Focus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 04:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Stuart,

Thank you for shedding more light on the details of the testing, and results received in Austin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart,</p>
<p>Thank you for shedding more light on the details of the testing, and results received in Austin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Rohre</title>
		<link>http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Rohre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas#comment-11</guid>
		<description>This is not a blow to the Radio Amateurs, as the city of Austin has them participating in the test; to see how much interfererence is caused to short wave reception and transmissions by licensed stations.  Already, one licensed mobile operator tester has reported that in the core of the test area, reception of NIST standard frequency station WWV is drowned out on portable receivers.  This is not good, as WWV is widely used by scientific and ham radio operators and Short wave listeners as a calibration standard for their reception equipment.

Some of the ham bands were adequately notched as is required of BPL to avoid interference, but some were not; showing just how flawed presnt BPL technology is.  BPL defies the physics of radio propagation; you do not put radio signals onto a medium, (open wiring) and not have problems with the signal leaking off the wires as they act as antennas.

One of the challenges to BPL is to operate without creating interference to FCC licensed users of the short wave spectrum.  Unfortunately overlooked by the FCC, is that the short wave receiver user, who has a free right to listen to any frequency, has no easy way to overcome local interference by the leaky radiation of BPL carrying power lines.  The BPL system does not include a way to sense when its power goes astray, and intrudes into the reception zone of other users of the short wave spectrum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a blow to the Radio Amateurs, as the city of Austin has them participating in the test; to see how much interfererence is caused to short wave reception and transmissions by licensed stations.  Already, one licensed mobile operator tester has reported that in the core of the test area, reception of NIST standard frequency station WWV is drowned out on portable receivers.  This is not good, as WWV is widely used by scientific and ham radio operators and Short wave listeners as a calibration standard for their reception equipment.</p>
<p>Some of the ham bands were adequately notched as is required of BPL to avoid interference, but some were not; showing just how flawed presnt BPL technology is.  BPL defies the physics of radio propagation; you do not put radio signals onto a medium, (open wiring) and not have problems with the signal leaking off the wires as they act as antennas.</p>
<p>One of the challenges to BPL is to operate without creating interference to FCC licensed users of the short wave spectrum.  Unfortunately overlooked by the FCC, is that the short wave receiver user, who has a free right to listen to any frequency, has no easy way to overcome local interference by the leaky radiation of BPL carrying power lines.  The BPL system does not include a way to sense when its power goes astray, and intrudes into the reception zone of other users of the short wave spectrum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Access Broadband over Power Line Promoted by FCC–BPL Provider of Broadband Over Power Line News and Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas/comment-page-1#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Access Broadband over Power Line Promoted by FCC–BPL Provider of Broadband Over Power Line News and Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 21:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.broadbandfocus.com/2006/08/broadband-over-powerline-testing-in-austin-texas#comment-3</guid>
		<description>[...] This is a blow to the Amateur Radio operators opposing BPL. With areas like Texas scheduled to test Broadband over Power Line, and this affirmation by the FCC, the momentum is beginning to roll. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is a blow to the Amateur Radio operators opposing BPL. With areas like Texas scheduled to test Broadband over Power Line, and this affirmation by the FCC, the momentum is beginning to roll. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
